Conservatives Have Conserved NOTHING

Like with any monster movie, if you show fear you make the monster stronger. When the fear dissipates, the monster becomes weak and dies. Most of the ground the right has lost to the left is a result of being in constant fear of being called ‘racist,’ for their beliefs.

It takes a lot of courage for people like Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Paul Joseph Watson, Dr Paul Gosar, Tucker Carlson, and other mainstream types to come out directly or indirectly in favor of the America first movement.  They are paving a path for others to be no longer fearful of the monster that is leftism, no longer fearful of being labeled.

If conservatives truly want to win the culture war, others need to follow.

It is ONLY with this sort of courage going forward that conservatives will actually begin to CONSERVE things like tradition, culture, God, family, prudence, and societal order instead of their current state of perpetual capitulation.

Because the republican party and mainstream conservatives have been either fearful of the communist tactic of labeling, or beholden to donors – the left has been winning the ‘culture war’ these same conservatives love to say they’re fighting.

Fear of the term Homophobic: Within just 5 years of gay marriage being normalized, we have drag queen story hour, adults dancing nude with children at parades, decriminalization of AIDS transmission, kids being chemically castrated, men competing in women’s events, and drag kids
Fear of the term Racist:
FROM AN ECONOMIC AND LOGICAL PERSPECTIVE:
• A record 67 MILLION speak a foreign language at home
• 71% of Hispanic immigrant households are on welfare
• 59% of Hispanics have children out of wedlock
• Almost 60% of Mexican immigrants don’t have a high school diploma
Since 1965 MILLIONS of low skilled workers have flowed into the country driving down the wages of Americans. The average company no longer has to compete for the worker and offer higher wages. Economist George Borjas outlines the effects of mass immigration in his book “we wanted workers” extensively in the chapter ‘Lennon’s Utopia,’ which addressed John Lennon’s hit song ‘Imagine.’ This paragraph explains all you need to know about why there is a push by paid off politicians for population replacement:
“After all the wage equalization predicted by open borders means that wages are equalized: workers who initially have high wages end up earning less, and workers who initially have low wages end up earning more. In fact, the earnings of the North’s native workforce will drop by almost 40% while Southern workers will more than double their earnings. One last redistributive impact that is worth mentioning – and again it is one of those nuisance statistics that is swept under the rug: the income of capitalists (corporations) worldwide will increase by almost 60 percent. In short a world with open borders creates very large gains for some groups (Southern workers and corporations) and very large losses for a group of workers who will vociferously fight the policy shift. And their refusal to go along with the open-borders advocates may have little to do with to do with racism or xenophobia. Northern workers simply do not benefit from the New World Order.”
America’s population went from 200 million in 1950 to 325 million today. This is not due to Americans having children because we have been below replacement birth rate since the 1960’s – This is due to immigration and the children they have.
Many misinformed people tend to claim that legal and illegal Hispanic immigrants are just doing the jobs that white or black Americans won’t do, however this is clearly not the case considering the fact that in the 1950’s America only had a single digit percentage of Hispanics. The job markets that Hispanics populate were once dominated by American workers until the wages of those jobs fell due to an influx of legal and illegal low skilled workers.
Today, the lower skilled population of Americans are majorly black.  Borjas also addressed the economic effects of illegal and legal immigration on black American workforce in a subsequent study following the publishing of his book.
“The employment rate of black men, and particularly of low-skill black men, fell precipitously from 1960 to 2000. At the same time, the incarceration rate of black men rose markedly. This paper examines the relation between immigration and these trends in black employment and incarceration. Using data drawn from the 1960-2000 U.S. Censuses, we find a strong correlation between immigration, black wages, black employment rates, and black incarceration rates. As immigrants disproportionately increased the supply of workers in a particular skill group, the wage of black workers in that group fell, the employment rate declined, and the incarceration rate rose. Our analysis suggests that a 10-percent immigrant-induced increase in the supply of a particular skill group reduced the black wage by 4.0 percent, lowered the employment rate of black men by 3.5 percentage points, and increased the incarceration rate of blacks by almost a full percentage point.”
A sensational left-wing outlet called ‘The Root’ actually articulated the economic effect of black America in an article entitled ‘How Illegal Immigration Hurts Black America.’ The only problem with this article is that the biggest economic impact on black Americans came by way of legal immigration, not just illegal immigration according to studies by various economists.
“Following a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid that nabbed 300 undocumented workers at a Columbia Farms processing plant in Columbia, S.C., a spooked House of Raeford quietly began replacing immigrants with native-born labor at all of its plants. Less than a year later, House of Raeford’s flagship production line in Raeford, N.C., had been transformed, going from more than 80 percent Latino to 70 percent African-American, according to a report by the Charlotte Observer.”
Homelessness is About to SKYROCKET Because of Immigration:
Many economists predict that AI will eventually claim anywhere between 20 million and 90 million low skilled jobs in America.  These jobs are obviously going to be largely in manufacturing, agriculture, and service.  The moral of the story that they’re conveniently refusing to tell you is that these jobs are now majorly done by legal and illegal hispanic immigrants.  Currently we are allowing 1.1 million legal immigrants in every single year.
A recent MIT model estimates that we have around 22 million illegal immigrants in the country on top of the legal immigrants that are continuously flowing in annually.  This spells disaster in approximately 10 to 15 years from now, as those jobs will largely be replaced by robots, and we have about 30 million additional people homeless on the streets.  The left will complain about jobs being replaced by AI in the future while they call for Universal Basic Income, while at the same time advocating for mass immigration from the third world.
There are 24 million Hispanic workers in the United States  and workers make up 16.2 percent of the U.S. workforce, and come from a variety of different backgrounds. The largest group by far is workers of Mexican descent, who comprise 62.1 percent of
the Hispanic workforce (14.9 million). The second largest group is those of Puerto Rican descent, who make up 8.7 percent of the Hispanic workforce (2.1 million). Salvadorans (1.1 million), Cubans (1.0 million), and Dominicans (780,000) are the next largest origin groups.
Hispanic workers can be found in every state and the District of Colombia, but are most likely to live in the state of California, where 6.4 million of Hispanic workers live (
The next highest concentration of Hispanic workers is in Texas (4.5 million), followed by Florida (2.2 million), New York (1.6 million), and Illinois (970,000).
All of these jobs will likely be replaced by automation with the next ten to twenty years.
Another important point about economics in an increasingly diversifying country: Leading up to the mortgage crisis, there was an 800% increase in mortgage approval in many minority majority areas. Most defaulted. The calls for mortgage approvals for minority with claims of ‘racism’ with banks hungry for predatory loans caused the crisis. Political correctness in an increasingly racially diverse and ethnically divided country caused the crisis.

In 1992, for example, the Federal Reserve Board released the results of a study that found, among other things, that blacks were twice as likely as whites to be denied mortgages. The chairman of Freddie Mac said the study was “very disturbing.” He concluded, “It is incumbent upon the industry to work together to eliminate any discriminatory lending practices, whether they are deliberate or inadvertent” (Washington Post, Oct. 28, 2008). The chairman of Fannie Mae expressed similar concerns.

On Capitol Hill, Rep. Kweisi Mfume, a Democrat from Maryland, said the study proved that lending agencies were racist. “People are being discriminated against by mortgage lenders based on the color of their skin,” he said. “Banks have a long way to go for meeting the legitimate needs of neighborhoods” (Reuters, May 8, 1992).

A series of research concluded that the incentive system created by the CRA coerced banks into abandoning safe and sound lending practices in order to meet racial quota-like lending marks. The research backs this with data correlating CRA eligibility (as determined by the lending test) with higher delinquency rates prior to 2008.
From an electoral perspective:
• 80% of hispanics support big government
• Hispanics have voted 70% for democrats consistently since 1968 and haven’t deviated
• 80% voted for Beto in top 5 TX counties
• Trump lost Virginia by 5 points but won the white vote by 25 points

In the top 5 counties in Texas that make up 36% of all Texans, Beto O’Rourke received 80% of the Latino vote over Ted Cruz.

Dallas county went from deep red to deep blue today and will never ever go red again.

California which once elected Reagan will never ever go red again.

In Arizona, a Democrat senator won there for the first time in a quarter century.

The undeniable reason for this drastic change is drastic demographic change. Eventually, and to deny this is to deny mathematics, a republican president will not only be soon unable to win Texas, but will be unable to win the presidency ever again.

Ben Shapiro claimed recently that ‘voting is malleable,’ and mentioned the Cuban vote in Florida.  The truth is that only 54% of Cubans in Florida backed Trump and there is also a massive generation divide in Cuban voting. Younger generations are increasingly voting in line with the rest of the hispanic population.

— Cubans who came to the U.S. before 1980 are 72 percent Republican, 11 percent Democratic and 17 percent no party affiliation.

— Cuban-Americans who weren’t born in Cuba are 41 percent Republican, 28 percent Democratic and 29 percent no party affiliation.

— Those who are 18 to 39 years old are 35 percent Republican, 23 percent Democratic and 40 percent no party affiliation.

— Seniors, people who are age 76 and older, are 76 percent Republican, 7 percent Democratic, 17 percent no party affiliation.

The lower identification with Republicans among younger voters shows up in the long-term trend of political affiliation in the Cuban-American community.

Hispanics nationwide have voted 70% for the Democratic Party consistently every single election since 1968, and Cubans make up less than 1% of the Hispanics in America.

 

From a constitutional perspective:
• Over 70% of hispanics say we should have strict gun control
• Almost 60% of hispanics say hate speech should be criminalized

According to Pew research 75% of Hispanics say it’s more important to institute gun control than to protect gun rights. 72% of Hispanics say that hate speech is violence, and 52% of hispanics say we should criminalize hate speech.

A recent survey conducted by the Campaign for Free Speech asked 1004 people about their attitudes toward the First Amendment. The results showed that 51% of millennials support a “hate speech” exemption in the first amendment. When that poll is broken down by race, it is almost identical to what the pew research poll showed.

When asked whether the First Amendment should be updated to adjust for hate speech and “reflect the cultural norms of today,” 59 percent of people between the ages of 18 and 34 were in favor of such an update. Just 33 percent opposed such a change, with the other eight percent saying they were unsure.

When asked more directly if “hate speech should be against the law,” 50 percent of people within the same age group answered “yes,” with 47 percent saying that an appropriate consequence for “hate speech” would include possible jail time.

Diversity is Not Our Strength, Homogeneity is:

Professor Robert Putnam, who conducted the largest study ever done on civic engagement in America, found that racial diversity is in fact our weakness and not the ‘strength’ the elites have tried to sell us.

The study determined that the greater the diversity in a community, the less people trust each other and the less they are engaged in their communities.

A recent poll showed that a record 67 million people speak a language other than English at home today which tells us that we don’t even share a language, let alone a culture any longer. The data show that diversity has led us to all of the crazy social justice ethnic conflict that your organization likes to make viral anti-sjw videos about. Diversity, by way of massive waves of legal immigrants and low birth rates, also caused the trouncing republicans experienced recently in Virginia.

Increased diversity as Robert Putnam concluded has led to low trust communities – and the unity of those communities are falling apart.
Many experts determine that this is likely the real reason for the increase in mass shootings we have seen as more young men are slipping through the cracks of society.
We have also witnessed an exponential upswing in deaths of despair in America likely due to the decline in social capital that both Toqueville and Putnam write about so eloquently.
We also know that the least diverse states and cities are typically the safest.
Increased Diversity has also resulted in SAT score changes, elimination of standardized testing in Ivy League schools, diversity departments in schools and businesses, whole districts saying math is racist, and all of the rest of the crazy social justice ethnic conflict ‘conservatives’ complain about.
The perpetual increase in racial diversity has also led to the ethnic conflict and ‘social justice’ crazies many mainstream conservatives like to make viral videos about but never admit why this conflict is occurring.
Republicans are so weak and so fearful of the ‘monster’ that is leftism and their labels, that they reprimanded Steve King because of a misconstrued quote, while AOC, Rashida Tlaib, and others express their hatred for whites explicitly.
The democrats understand NEVER CONCEDE!

While ‘conservatives’ are fearful of being called a ‘separatist’ or ‘supremacist,’ they have given up entire control of academia and media to the left. Now, actual scientists and students are being taught that any difference in outcome across racial lines is because of ‘racism.’
Of course the left denies the income and educational success differences between Asians and whites, because it is inconvenient to their narrative. We know why these differences exist but it is now “bigoted” to admit it. Why? Because the right wing allows this out of fear.

So why is it that in every school, regardless of being a rich district or poor district, that Asians are at the top of every test score? Why is the ranking always:
1. Asian
2. White
3. Hispanic
4. Black
Well it is because of the average IQ differences that have been proven by science in 100 years of IQ data that we have.
The right out of fear, has also allowed the left to attack and target academia if they do not capitulate to their anti-scientific social justice and communist equity agenda.

James D Watson, a Noble prize-winning scientist was recently stripped of his honorary titles at a lab after doubling down on his research regarding intelligence and race being highly heritable. The point of contention surrounding race and IQ is not if there are differences because the data is conclusive on this, the point of contention has always been are the differences mostly due to DNA or culture.  Watson’s research determined it was mostly due to heritability as many other honest researchers have concluded.

Watson, 90, who shared a 1962 Nobel Prize for discovering that DNA was a double helix, lost his job in 2007 for expressing racist views. Did the conservatives stand up for Watson? No, out of fear they ceded science and the rest of academia.

IQ rates are dropping all across the west now Not in china or japan though. I wonder why…

Brown University was criticized in 2018 over its decision to remove news about a study on transgender youth from its website.

The paper by assistant professor Lisa Littman suggests that gender dysphoria, or a conflict between one’s gender identity and sex assigned at birth, occurring around the time of puberty — as opposed to early childhood — could be due to peer pressure or online influences.

The study, which was published last month in Plos One, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, used the observations of parents, who critics say could be politically biased or opposed to their children identifying as transgender.

Brown representatives say they removed the article because of concerns over the study’s research methodology but it was more likely removed due to threats from the left.

From a National Security and Crime Perspective:

• Hispanics commit murder at a per capita rate that is triple the rate of whites

• Hispanics commit rape at a per capita rate that is double the rate of whites

• Hispanics commit robbery at a per capita rate that is quadruple the rate of whites

• Almost 50% of all gang members are hispanic

America has the highest gangs to people per 100,000 rate of any developed nation.  This is partly why the notion of comparing the US to developed countries when it comes to crime and gun control is silly to say the least.  According to the national gang center, gang membership per capita and gangs have been on a steady rise since 1960.  It seems that in the 1990’s the Clinton crime bill may actually have been effective in reducing crime.  The rise of the internet and technology also played a big role.  Violent crime in terms of rape, robbery, and aggravated assault have tripled per 100,000 since the 1950’s.

Fear of being called a fascist:
Pornography is now easily accessible to children and usage has dramatically increased because of the internet and mobile device prevalence.
According to multiple studies, porn use is correlated to docile men, low birth rates, and acceptance of deviancy and sexual diversity.
Studies also show there is a direct correlation to a decline in religiosity and steep rise in promiscuity. A decline in religiosity is also directly correlated to low birth rates. The left has set their sights on the nuclear family as Engels and Marx would say, and the right has capitulated at every turn in fear of being labeled. Gay marriage, promiscuity, pornography, drag queen story hour, decriminalization of AIDS transmission, nude adults dancing with children at parades, kindergarteners learning how to masturbate, kids being chemically castrated and dressed up as the opposite gender, and trans kids being invited on national tv shows in attempts to normalize this too as they did with gay marriage.
We all know what happened to Weimar after these things started to occur.

What Has Conservatism Conserved?

All of the things that conservatives say they want to conserve; Traditional Family structure, religiosity, prudence, order, 1st amendment, 2nd amendment, American exceptionalism, are not being conserved. “Conservatism’ has conserved nothing Why?
Because of fear of the monster.
SHARE